Qualitative Exploration
Jobs To Be Done

How Jobs To Be Done Framework Helps Prioritize UX Fixes Based on User Needs

Qualitative Exploration

How Jobs To Be Done Framework Helps Prioritize UX Fixes Based on User Needs

Introduction

Great digital products don’t just work – they solve real problems for real people. But when user interfaces start to feel clunky, confusing, or slow, it’s not always obvious which fixes will make the biggest difference. UX teams often face long lists of bugs, design tweaks, and feature requests without a clear sense of what’s truly impacting the user experience. This is where the Jobs To Be Done (JTBD) framework offers a fresh lens. Rather than focusing solely on traditional UX performance metrics or surface-level usability concerns, JTBD dives beneath the behavior to understand the deeper “why.” Why does the user need this feature? What goal are they trying to accomplish? What’s standing in their way? By centering UX prioritization around user intent and desired outcomes, product teams can make more confident design choices and focus their efforts on what drives success.
This article explores how the JTBD framework can transform the way UX and product teams prioritize user experience fixes. Instead of defaulting to bug tallies or subjective opinions, Jobs To Be Done encourages teams to look at the specific challenges users face while trying to achieve a goal. This perspective empowers product developers, designers, and business leaders to make truly impactful improvements that align with user needs – not just technical requirements. If you're a decision-maker, product owner, UX strategist, or working in customer research, this post is for you. We’ll explain how to prioritize UX fixes using Jobs To Be Done thinking, including: - Why bug counts alone can mislead prioritization - How understanding user intent clarifies what issues matter most - The benefits of Jobs To Be Done in UX design and product development Whether you’re delivering a mobile app, streamlining onboarding, or improving ecommerce flow, the JTBD approach provides a practical, people-centered method to improve the user experience. Let’s take a closer look at how this works in practice.
This article explores how the JTBD framework can transform the way UX and product teams prioritize user experience fixes. Instead of defaulting to bug tallies or subjective opinions, Jobs To Be Done encourages teams to look at the specific challenges users face while trying to achieve a goal. This perspective empowers product developers, designers, and business leaders to make truly impactful improvements that align with user needs – not just technical requirements. If you're a decision-maker, product owner, UX strategist, or working in customer research, this post is for you. We’ll explain how to prioritize UX fixes using Jobs To Be Done thinking, including: - Why bug counts alone can mislead prioritization - How understanding user intent clarifies what issues matter most - The benefits of Jobs To Be Done in UX design and product development Whether you’re delivering a mobile app, streamlining onboarding, or improving ecommerce flow, the JTBD approach provides a practical, people-centered method to improve the user experience. Let’s take a closer look at how this works in practice.

Why Traditional Bug Counts Don’t Tell the Full Story in UX

When UX teams assess the health of a user experience, they often start by reviewing bug reports. While counting defects can feel like a clear measure of progress, it's not always a reliable indicator of what users truly need fixed. Many product teams fall into a cycle of technical triage – prioritizing fixes based on severity or frequency – but may miss the real blockers hiding beneath the surface. Bug counts provide a snapshot of technical or visual flaws: a broken link here, a misaligned button there. But not all issues have the same impact on users. A minor design glitch on a settings page may look bad but rarely affects customer behavior. On the other hand, a confusing checkout step that’s technically working fine might lead to cart abandonment. Not all fixes carry equal weight when it comes to user satisfaction or business outcomes. That’s why volume alone can be misleading. Here’s why traditional approaches to UX problem prioritization can fall short:
  • Lack of context: Bug logs don’t reveal *why* a user was affected or what they were trying to achieve.
  • Focus on symptoms: Fixing visible issues doesn’t address deeper usability friction users feel during key tasks.
  • One-size-fits-all scoring: Prioritizing by severity or number of reports often ignores strategic goals or user intent.
For example, an app might have ten reported display issues in a rarely used settings area and only one report about a multi-step sign-up process. Fixing the display issues may feel productive, but streamlining the sign-up flow could unlock more value. This is where a different approach becomes crucial. Market research tools and methods like the JTBD framework provide a structured way to uncover what users are actually trying to accomplish. By identifying the most important "jobs" users hire your product to do – such as onboarding smoothly, completing a task quickly, or finding information easily – you gain clarity on what experience problems really matter, regardless of bug count. UX strategy rooted in Jobs To Be Done helps teams shift from fixing everything to fixing the things that move the needle. It gives a shared language to prioritize not just by technical status, but by user needs and business impact.

How Jobs To Be Done Refocuses UX Prioritization on User Intent

The Jobs To Be Done (JTBD) framework flips the script on UX prioritization by starting not with the product, but with the user’s ultimate goal. Rather than asking, “What’s broken?” JTBD asks, “What is the user trying to do, and what’s preventing them from doing it?” This simple shift creates more clarity about which UX issues truly block progress – and helps teams focus their efforts where it counts the most. In JTBD thinking, users “hire” a product or service to get a specific job done. That job might be functional (“I want to transfer money quickly”), emotional (“I want to feel confident about my transaction”), or social (“I want to look capable in front of my manager”). The key is understanding these desired outcomes across the customer journey. When viewed through this lens, UX fixes stop being about aesthetics or ticket volume and become about removing friction from key user jobs. For example:

Without JTBD:

- A product team receives reports of low engagement on a new dashboard feature. They assume it needs a visual refresh.

With JTBD:

- By using JTBD interviews, the team learns users are trying to "quickly compare performance across teams," but can’t filter or summarize data clearly. The real fix is simplifying how data is grouped – not a visual overhaul. This approach to UX prioritization aligns the team’s work with what customers are really trying to accomplish. It also creates better collaboration between UX, product, research, and design by grounding fixes in shared understanding.

Key benefits of using JTBD to improve user experience:

  • Reveal hidden bottlenecks: JTBD identifies moments where users fail to make progress, even when no bugs exist.
  • Clarify what truly matters: Not every request or pain point is tied to a key job. JTBD helps teams filter the noise.
  • Bridge research to design: Customer research becomes immediately actionable, tied to specific UX strategy decisions.
User experience prioritization with JTBD also complements other market research tools and methods teams may already use. While JTBD isn’t the only lens to evaluate product development challenges, it adds a powerful customer-focused perspective that ties design decisions back to human goals. For teams focused on creating lasting value – not just temporary fixes – understanding the JTBD method for product teams can help unlock better results. Whether you’re optimizing a digital workflow or launching a new service, the JTBD approach to UX improvement gives you a stronger foundation to ask, "Is this helping our users get their job done?" In the next section, we’ll explore how teams can turn JTBD insights into practical UX actions that improve satisfaction and reduce friction.

Examples of UX Fixes Prioritized Through a JTBD Lens

One of the biggest strengths of the Jobs To Be Done (JTBD) framework is its power to uncover why users engage with a product in the first place. Rather than reacting to surface-level issues like click rates or app crashes, JTBD focuses on the user’s end goal – the actual “job” they are hiring your product to perform. This mindset shift leads to more meaningful user experience fixes because every decision is tied back to the user's desired outcome.

Here are a few case scenarios where JTBD helped prioritize impactful UX improvements:

Example 1: Streamlining Onboarding for Mental Health Apps

A digital health platform discovered its users were not completing onboarding flows. A typical fix might involve shortening the steps or redesigning the form layout. However, after applying JTBD research, the team found that users' core job was “to feel better quickly without added emotional effort.” The insight shifted the team’s direction from UI tweaks to creating a guided, empathetic onboarding journey that instilled emotional trust before asking for personal information. Drop-off rates fell, and engagement improved significantly.

Example 2: Reducing Abandonment in E-Commerce Checkout

E-commerce shoppers often abandon carts – but why? A JTBD lens revealed that the underlying job was “to buy the right product effortlessly and confidently.” Instead of addressing button placements or auto-fill settings alone, the team prioritized adding clearer size guides, return policy assurances, and customer reviews upfront. These fixes aligned better with the emotional and functional aspects of the shopper's goal, reducing friction and improving conversions.

Example 3: Clarifying Navigation in B2B Software

B2B users trying a new customer relationship management (CRM) tool were getting lost during set-up. JTBD interviews revealed a job of “to organize client information quickly so I appear prepared and competent.” Traditional bug logs had flagged navigational confusion, but the insights showed that performance issues weren’t the main blockers – lack of guidance was. The team prioritized adding in-app tips and templated workflows, allowing users to feel confident from the start.

In these examples, UX fixes were not chosen at random or by guesswork. They were prioritized based on users’ true pains and progress points. This strategic approach is a defining advantage of user experience prioritization with JTBD.

Steps to Connect JTBD Customer Research to UX Decisions

Once you’ve conducted customer research using the JTBD framework, the next step is acting on those insights to improve your UX. But how do you translate a user’s “job” into a clear design decision? This can feel complex, especially if your team is used to working from dashboards or feature request lists.

Here’s a simple step-by-step approach for turning JTBD insights into UX design priorities:

1. Identify the Core Jobs and Struggles

Start by summarizing what job users are trying to accomplish with your product. JTBD interviews and observations often reveal emotional drivers, anxieties, and unmet needs. Organize these into core and secondary jobs – the main goal and any supporting tasks that enable it.

Example: A job might be “to quickly compare software options so I can recommend the best one to my boss.” Key struggles could include unclear feature differentiation or lack of side-by-side comparisons.

2. Map Pain Points to Jobs

Now, walk through your current user journey and flag where pain points make that job harder to complete. These are your opportunity zones for UX intervention. Avoid looking at bugs in isolation – instead, connect each one back to a job being blocked.

Ask: “Does this slowdown stop users from making progress on their job?”

3. Prioritize UX Fixes Based on Impact to Job Completion

Prioritization becomes clearer when you ask, “Which issues most directly affect the user’s ability to complete their job with confidence?” These ROI-positive fixes should be at the top of your UX backlog. Small design changes that unblock major tasks can be more valuable than larger redesigns that miss the job goal.

4. Use JTBD to Justify Design Trade-Offs

Product and UX teams often face tough choices – what to fix now, what to delay, and what to drop. JTBD gives your team a shared language to explain why certain fixes matter more. When optimization decisions get tricky, return to the job-to-be-done and ask what drives real user satisfaction.

5. Test Changes Against the Job Goal

After launching UX improvements, validate whether users now complete their jobs more smoothly. This can be measured qualitatively (via interviews) or quantitatively (job completion time, repeat usage). Iterate if needed, but always keep job progress at the center of evaluation.

By following these steps, organizations transform qualitative customer research into actionable UX strategy. JTBD creates a user experience improvement process that is rooted in empathy, clarity, and business value.

How UX Teams and Product Managers Can Work Together Using JTBD

Bringing the Jobs To Be Done methodology into your UX and product development processes doesn’t just improve the user experience – it also helps teams collaborate more effectively. When UX designers and product managers share a deep understanding of what users are really trying to accomplish, they can align roadmaps, streamline decisions, and deliver more impactful outcomes together.

Building a Shared Language Around Jobs

One key benefit of integrating JTBD into your workflow is that it creates a unifying framework. UX teams naturally focus on usability and interaction, while product managers may be balancing growth metrics, timelines, and stakeholder needs. The JTBD approach allows both groups to center on what the user actually needs rather than what they say they want or what features competitors offer.

Collaborating Around Customer Research

High-impact collaboration begins with shared exposure to research. Rather than having user interviews or surveys live in silos, bring PMs and UX leads into the room – or the recordings – to hear firsthand accounts of user struggles. Discuss jobs collectively, and highlight how different user segments may carry different functional, emotional, or social goals.

Even simple tools like job stories (e.g., “When I’m evaluating options, I want to compare top features so I feel confident in my pick”) help steer product discussions around real user drivers.

Working as a Unified Prioritization Team

Once shared JTBD insights are in hand, co-prioritization becomes clearer. Product managers can use these insights to inform planning and sequencing, while UX teams translate the jobs into specific enhancements, flows, or interface updates. This prevents misalignment, such as investing in new features users aren’t asking for – or worse, can’t use effectively.

Together, teams can:

  • Identify which UX problems most impact job success
  • Agree on which issues merit short-term sprint inclusion vs. long-term roadmap planning
  • Create JTBD-based metrics to measure the success of UX and product changes

Encouraging Ongoing Iteration

JTBD isn’t a one-and-done insight. It should evolve as users, markets, and technologies shift. Both product managers and UX leads should revisit JTBD research regularly to track how user expectations have changed – and adjust priorities accordingly.

JTBD gives UX and product teams a clearer way to listen, align, and act. That means fewer guesses and more decisions grounded in what truly drives growth and satisfaction.

Summary

Prioritizing UX improvements is often more complex than fixing bugs or responding to feedback tickets. While those methods serve a role, they don’t answer the core question: Why do users come to your product – and where are they getting stuck? The Jobs To Be Done (JTBD) framework reshapes this conversation by focusing on the underlying goals and motivations that drive user behavior.

From debunking the limits of traditional UX metrics to showing how JTBD shifts teams toward intention-based design, this post explored how user experience prioritization with JTBD leads to more predictable, user-centered outcomes. We also shared real-world examples of UX fixes tailored to customer jobs, outlined actionable steps for connecting research to product changes, and offered collaboration strategies for designers and PMs looking to align efforts using JTBD.

Integrating the JTBD approach into your UX strategy doesn’t replace other tools – it strengthens them by bringing customer context to the forefront. Whether you’re rethinking your roadmap or refining micro-interactions, understanding the “job” your product is hired to do ensures that every improvement drives meaningful progress for your users.

Summary

Prioritizing UX improvements is often more complex than fixing bugs or responding to feedback tickets. While those methods serve a role, they don’t answer the core question: Why do users come to your product – and where are they getting stuck? The Jobs To Be Done (JTBD) framework reshapes this conversation by focusing on the underlying goals and motivations that drive user behavior.

From debunking the limits of traditional UX metrics to showing how JTBD shifts teams toward intention-based design, this post explored how user experience prioritization with JTBD leads to more predictable, user-centered outcomes. We also shared real-world examples of UX fixes tailored to customer jobs, outlined actionable steps for connecting research to product changes, and offered collaboration strategies for designers and PMs looking to align efforts using JTBD.

Integrating the JTBD approach into your UX strategy doesn’t replace other tools – it strengthens them by bringing customer context to the forefront. Whether you’re rethinking your roadmap or refining micro-interactions, understanding the “job” your product is hired to do ensures that every improvement drives meaningful progress for your users.

In this article

Why Traditional Bug Counts Don’t Tell the Full Story in UX
How Jobs To Be Done Refocuses UX Prioritization on User Intent
Examples of UX Fixes Prioritized Through a JTBD Lens
Steps to Connect JTBD Customer Research to UX Decisions
How UX Teams and Product Managers Can Work Together Using JTBD

In this article

Why Traditional Bug Counts Don’t Tell the Full Story in UX
How Jobs To Be Done Refocuses UX Prioritization on User Intent
Examples of UX Fixes Prioritized Through a JTBD Lens
Steps to Connect JTBD Customer Research to UX Decisions
How UX Teams and Product Managers Can Work Together Using JTBD

Last updated: May 25, 2025

Curious how JTBD-led insights can sharpen your UX and product strategy?

Curious how JTBD-led insights can sharpen your UX and product strategy?

Curious how JTBD-led insights can sharpen your UX and product strategy?

At SIVO Insights, we help businesses understand people.
Let's talk about how we can support you and your business!

SIVO On Demand Talent is ready to boost your research capacity.
Let's talk about how we can support you and your team!

Your message has been received.
We will be in touch soon!
Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Please try again or contact us directly at contact@sivoinsights.com